<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good enough &#8230; intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3305</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:02:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3305#comment-859883</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3305#comment-859883</guid>
		<description>I am not aware of any evidence suggesting that human intelligence is anywhere near optimal.  We are evolution&#039;s first stab at building an engineered civilization.  The chances of our brains being anywhere near optimal seem pretty miniscule.

Already we can see a global nervous system taking shape.  Such a nervous system seems likely to be associated with a rather large brain - the size of a big data-centre, perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not aware of any evidence suggesting that human intelligence is anywhere near optimal.  We are evolution&#8217;s first stab at building an engineered civilization.  The chances of our brains being anywhere near optimal seem pretty miniscule.</p>
<p>Already we can see a global nervous system taking shape.  Such a nervous system seems likely to be associated with a rather large brain &#8211; the size of a big data-centre, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterh</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3305#comment-859879</link>
		<dc:creator>peterh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3305#comment-859879</guid>
		<description>&quot;because it’s an optimum spot in the spectrum of possibilities.&quot;

Optimal?  Um, no.  As the article already said, nothing about us is &quot;optimal&quot; -- just Good Enough.

I expect neo entities to have both completely different platforms and wildly variable proximate definitions of optimal -- or rather, &quot;good enough&quot;.  If you have near-telepathy-level communication and can download skills, maybe you can be quite a bit slower on the uptake and still be more than &quot;good enough&quot;.

(OTOH, it&#039;s not all going to be thermal grease and fresh batteries: you might need a lot of warez smarts to avoid bogus skill downloads that actually try to get you to send your upload credits to Elbonia.)

Anyway, I foresee no remarkable peak near ours looking forward.  We do already have vague suspicions about scaling laws.  By those rules, the bulk of all &quot;intelligences&quot; should more resemble insects, if not bacteria.

Regards,
 -- peterh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;because it’s an optimum spot in the spectrum of possibilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>Optimal?  Um, no.  As the article already said, nothing about us is &#8220;optimal&#8221; &#8212; just Good Enough.</p>
<p>I expect neo entities to have both completely different platforms and wildly variable proximate definitions of optimal &#8212; or rather, &#8220;good enough&#8221;.  If you have near-telepathy-level communication and can download skills, maybe you can be quite a bit slower on the uptake and still be more than &#8220;good enough&#8221;.</p>
<p>(OTOH, it&#8217;s not all going to be thermal grease and fresh batteries: you might need a lot of warez smarts to avoid bogus skill downloads that actually try to get you to send your upload credits to Elbonia.)</p>
<p>Anyway, I foresee no remarkable peak near ours looking forward.  We do already have vague suspicions about scaling laws.  By those rules, the bulk of all &#8220;intelligences&#8221; should more resemble insects, if not bacteria.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
 &#8212; peterh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
