<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Martian Graffiti</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3615</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gentile</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3615#comment-865771</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gentile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3615#comment-865771</guid>
		<description>Yes, good point that there is perhaps little understanding of the exact physics of earth&#039;s weather systems.  Lots of theories, but are we going to do something drastic to our planet based on a theory? Real nanotech would give us the insight and ability to fix any real problems the earth has, but how much is spent on real nanotech vs. the global warming farcical pseudo-science?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good point that there is perhaps little understanding of the exact physics of earth&#8217;s weather systems.  Lots of theories, but are we going to do something drastic to our planet based on a theory? Real nanotech would give us the insight and ability to fix any real problems the earth has, but how much is spent on real nanotech vs. the global warming farcical pseudo-science?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3615#comment-865758</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3615#comment-865758</guid>
		<description>Those concerned with global warming do seem to be wasting their time.

On the other hand, they are probably interfering less than they could be doing if they were to directly oppose intelligent machines or nanotechnology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those concerned with global warming do seem to be wasting their time.</p>
<p>On the other hand, they are probably interfering less than they could be doing if they were to directly oppose intelligent machines or nanotechnology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>