<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Towers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865959</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865959</guid>
		<description>There is a scheme to build a 20km + tower though, since it relies onlarge bags of helium &amp; active control systems it is a bit of a fiddle.   http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.com/2009/06/big-engineering-33-inflatable-200-km.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a scheme to build a 20km + tower though, since it relies onlarge bags of helium &amp; active control systems it is a bit of a fiddle.   <a href="http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.com/2009/06/big-engineering-33-inflatable-200-km.html" rel="nofollow">http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.com/2009/06/big-engineering-33-inflatable-200-km.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Townshend</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865936</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Townshend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865936</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something High Victorian about this website: and I use the expression in the best possible sense. A total non-techo, I come here for the exuberance and sheer confidence of you nanotechies.

Enough mingy, defeatist, thou-shalt-not science. Enough with crying resource-poor. 

The great Rugby League halfback, Peter Sterling, was notoriously slow on his feet. The key to his success was that he never watched the opposition, only the gaps in the opposition. That&#039;s what you guys seem to be doing. Love your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something High Victorian about this website: and I use the expression in the best possible sense. A total non-techo, I come here for the exuberance and sheer confidence of you nanotechies.</p>
<p>Enough mingy, defeatist, thou-shalt-not science. Enough with crying resource-poor. </p>
<p>The great Rugby League halfback, Peter Sterling, was notoriously slow on his feet. The key to his success was that he never watched the opposition, only the gaps in the opposition. That&#8217;s what you guys seem to be doing. Love your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kuntzman</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865935</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kuntzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865935</guid>
		<description>&quot;Put only one of these per square mile — it takes up less than 1% of that area [...] — and you can put the current population of the Earth in about the area of Montana.&quot;

You would still need space for food production and industry. Vertical farming is being developed, or at least talked about, but I&#039;m not aware of any vertical industry research. Of course, a mature nanotechnology would drastically affect both of these.

Also, I suspect it may be more efficient to build a smaller number of 10 mile towers than a large number of 1 mile towers. Btw, at 40,000,000 people per 10 mile tower, it&#039;s only 250 towers for a population of 10 billion. 500 towers at half the density.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Put only one of these per square mile — it takes up less than 1% of that area [...] — and you can put the current population of the Earth in about the area of Montana.&#8221;</p>
<p>You would still need space for food production and industry. Vertical farming is being developed, or at least talked about, but I&#8217;m not aware of any vertical industry research. Of course, a mature nanotechnology would drastically affect both of these.</p>
<p>Also, I suspect it may be more efficient to build a smaller number of 10 mile towers than a large number of 1 mile towers. Btw, at 40,000,000 people per 10 mile tower, it&#8217;s only 250 towers for a population of 10 billion. 500 towers at half the density.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Does The Burj Dubai Mean For Skyscrapers? &#171; Tai-Chi Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865926</link>
		<dc:creator>What Does The Burj Dubai Mean For Skyscrapers? &#171; Tai-Chi Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3651#comment-865926</guid>
		<description>[...] What Does The Burj Dubai Mean For&#160;Skyscrapers? January 4, 2010 Posted by taoist in Cool Stuff.  Tags: Burj Dubai, Technology, UAE trackback  And how humanity lives? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What Does The Burj Dubai Mean For&nbsp;Skyscrapers? January 4, 2010 Posted by taoist in Cool Stuff.  Tags: Burj Dubai, Technology, UAE trackback  And how humanity lives? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>