<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Towers and orbits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-866006</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-866006</guid>
		<description>A &quot;half-way&quot; approach has some merit, but trying to launch up to a grappling hook waiting in the sky is kind of the reverse of which half we would want.

I think the best theoretical concept I saw was to build a linear accelerator up the side of Mount Kilimanjaro, which gets us to 5 km, and then extend the track another 5km or so.  That&#039;s only gotten us through about 10% of the atmosphere, though.

Once you&#039;re in space, you&#039;re halfway to anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8220;half-way&#8221; approach has some merit, but trying to launch up to a grappling hook waiting in the sky is kind of the reverse of which half we would want.</p>
<p>I think the best theoretical concept I saw was to build a linear accelerator up the side of Mount Kilimanjaro, which gets us to 5 km, and then extend the track another 5km or so.  That&#8217;s only gotten us through about 10% of the atmosphere, though.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;re in space, you&#8217;re halfway to anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake Oil Baron</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-865974</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake Oil Baron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-865974</guid>
		<description>What about a hybrid approach? Have a geosynchronous station with a cable that only goes down part of the way down and a tower below it to launch rockets from that are equipped with a grabbing devise. After launching and grabbing the tether, it could either be pulled up to geosynchronous orbit or climb up like a space elevator. The tower would not need to be as high and the cable would not need to support the full weight all the way to the ground.

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a hybrid approach? Have a geosynchronous station with a cable that only goes down part of the way down and a tower below it to launch rockets from that are equipped with a grabbing devise. After launching and grabbing the tether, it could either be pulled up to geosynchronous orbit or climb up like a space elevator. The tower would not need to be as high and the cable would not need to support the full weight all the way to the ground.</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent_Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-865961</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent_Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-865961</guid>
		<description>Sorry - ignore my brain fart/wishful thinking.  Km is right, duh.  6400km just seems so damnably high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; ignore my brain fart/wishful thinking.  Km is right, duh.  6400km just seems so damnably high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent_Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-865960</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent_Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3666#comment-865960</guid>
		<description>Great post, although I&#039;m fairly sure your X axis is meters, not km.  Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, although I&#8217;m fairly sure your X axis is meters, not km.  Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>