<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. military to use memristors for neural computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3827</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3827#comment-867432</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3827#comment-867432</guid>
		<description>I was reminded by Blaise Mouttet that I neglected to mention Bernie Woodrow&#039;s 3 terminal device that functions just like a memristor, and was built in 1960. Though it was not a solid state device. 

He also gave a link to a solid state memristor built in 1968 by F. Argall, 3 years before Chua coined the term. It was constructed of doped Titanium Dioxide, somewhat similar to HP&#039;s device. You can see from the current-voltage behavior of the device that it is exactly a memristor. http://pdf.com.ru/a/ky1300.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reminded by Blaise Mouttet that I neglected to mention Bernie Woodrow&#8217;s 3 terminal device that functions just like a memristor, and was built in 1960. Though it was not a solid state device. </p>
<p>He also gave a link to a solid state memristor built in 1968 by F. Argall, 3 years before Chua coined the term. It was constructed of doped Titanium Dioxide, somewhat similar to HP&#8217;s device. You can see from the current-voltage behavior of the device that it is exactly a memristor. <a href="http://pdf.com.ru/a/ky1300.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://pdf.com.ru/a/ky1300.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forrest Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3827#comment-867402</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrest Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3827#comment-867402</guid>
		<description>Forgive my pedantry, but if you look into the history of this they didn&#039;t actually create the first memristor in 2008. Rather, they were the first group to create memristors *on purpose*. As Williams himself reports in other lectures and papers, people had been creating memristor devices for decades, but just hadn&#039;t realized it. Williams&#039; group was probably the first to actually realize that these devices were the same ones that had been described by Chua and dubbed the &quot;memristor&quot; back in 1971.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my pedantry, but if you look into the history of this they didn&#8217;t actually create the first memristor in 2008. Rather, they were the first group to create memristors *on purpose*. As Williams himself reports in other lectures and papers, people had been creating memristor devices for decades, but just hadn&#8217;t realized it. Williams&#8217; group was probably the first to actually realize that these devices were the same ones that had been described by Chua and dubbed the &#8220;memristor&#8221; back in 1971.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The memristor rises; commercialization and academic research in the US; carbon nanotubes could be made safer than we thought &#171; FrogHeart</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3827#comment-867398</link>
		<dc:creator>The memristor rises; commercialization and academic research in the US; carbon nanotubes could be made safer than we thought &#171; FrogHeart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3827#comment-867398</guid>
		<description>[...] turn it back on). In the longer term, they talk about hardware being able to learn. (Thanks to the Foresight Institute for the latest update on the memristor story and the pointer to HPlus.) Do visit the HPlus site as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] turn it back on). In the longer term, they talk about hardware being able to learn. (Thanks to the Foresight Institute for the latest update on the memristor story and the pointer to HPlus.) Do visit the HPlus site as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>