Comments on: Can “artificial life” evolve intelligence? An update http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Delphi http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-934451 Delphi Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:44:30 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-934451 what if these new "brain structures," or wetware or whatever one wishes to call them could become "vessels" for dimensional entities? one can't engineer coherent thought, so how could an assembler "build" one? i mean, what is driving a machine's path to sentient thought? i'm just saying... what if these new “brain structures,” or wetware or whatever one wishes to call them could become “vessels” for dimensional entities?

one can’t engineer coherent thought, so how could an assembler “build” one?

i mean, what is driving a machine’s path to sentient thought?

i’m just saying…

]]> By: Marktron http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-930498 Marktron Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:42:55 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-930498 Ok, the artificial intelligence in fact is the organization of any kind of knowledge (it could be the action or reaction, information etc..) to solve a task nonplanned satisfactorily, it means that an automatic machine is not intelligent, it´s just an automation, The intelligence requires to jump the database of posible things or programmed things. Yeah an artificial cell must be intelligent in a evolution process or adaptation to something. The organic cell is not intelligente with some virus like VIH. Long life to the articial life!!! Ok, the artificial intelligence in fact is the organization of any kind of knowledge (it could be the action or reaction, information etc..) to solve a task nonplanned satisfactorily, it means that an automatic machine is not intelligent, it´s just an automation, The intelligence requires to jump the database of posible things or programmed things.
Yeah an artificial cell must be intelligent in a evolution process or adaptation to something.
The organic cell is not intelligente with some virus like VIH.
Long life to the articial life!!!

]]> By: John Burch http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-925485 John Burch Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:08:05 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-925485 Hi, I realize a brain is a neural net but it seems to be organized with higher level connections which means, to me, that you will not get higher intelligence out of a single bowl of neural stew. Maybe exceedingly good pattern recognizers, or a balance control system, but not a person. In fact I would not want to create an entire brain(mind) as one neural net. It would be as much a black box as any of these neural nets already walking around (people). I'd rather see a mind put together out of subsystems and then you might have some hope of knowing what was going on inside and might give you a handle on how to affect it's operation. For more perspectives and a suggestion for how to create self-awareness in a computer, visit <a href="http://www.nanofuture2030.com" rel="nofollow">Nanofuture2030</a> Hi, I realize a brain is a neural net but it seems to be organized with higher level connections which means, to me, that you will not get higher intelligence out of a single bowl of neural stew. Maybe exceedingly good pattern recognizers, or a balance control system, but not a person. In fact I would not want to create an entire brain(mind) as one neural net. It would be as much a black box as any of these neural nets already walking around (people). I’d rather see a mind put together out of subsystems and then you might have some hope of knowing what was going on inside and might give you a handle on how to affect it’s operation. For more perspectives and a suggestion for how to create self-awareness in a computer, visit Nanofuture2030

]]> By: Hephaestus http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-912138 Hephaestus Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:21:40 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4154#comment-912138 It seems to me this HyperNEAT might be usable for the recognition portion of a mind machine interface. If the evolutionary algorithms were set up to evolve for speed and accuracy of pattern matches it might be possible with an Nvidia GPU and little hardware for input to get this done in short order. It seems to me this HyperNEAT might be usable for the recognition portion of a mind machine interface. If the evolutionary algorithms were set up to evolve for speed and accuracy of pattern matches it might be possible with an Nvidia GPU and little hardware for input to get this done in short order.

]]>