http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4344 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4344#comment-988705 Microscopía inteligente a través de un nuevo software que genera eficiencia y mejora resultados « RDi Press Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:59:59 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4344#comment-988705 [...] One-molecule robot to be presented at January’s TEDxCaltech conference (foresight.org) [...] [...] One-molecule robot to be presented at January’s TEDxCaltech conference (foresight.org) [...]

]]> http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4344#comment-984009 Matt Cuttler Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:50:21 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4344#comment-984009 I wanted to introduce you to Nanotechnology Dashboard and Resources on Academic Room: http://academicroom.com/discipline/411476 - Please provide us with you suggestions for improvement. I wanted to introduce you to Nanotechnology Dashboard and Resources on Academic Room: http://academicroom.com/discipline/411476 – Please provide us with you suggestions for improvement.

]]> http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4344#comment-982707 James Gentile Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:40:56 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=4344#comment-982707 Using some kind of wi-fi to have nanobots communicate with macroscopic servers seems most probable to me. For instance, the nanobot would communicate what it sensors 'see' and the server would compute how the nanobot should react and what it should do next and send it back. This way you don't have to put huge amounts of computation in the nanobot nor rely on unreliable environmental 'bread crumbs' because that's never going to go into a production nanobot. Of course that will have to wait until are ability to engineer at the nanometer increases somewhat obviously, as even a simple wi-fi and small cpu would probably be too difficult to do right now. Using some kind of wi-fi to have nanobots communicate with macroscopic servers seems most probable to me. For instance, the nanobot would communicate what it sensors ‘see’ and the server would compute how the nanobot should react and what it should do next and send it back. This way you don’t have to put huge amounts of computation in the nanobot nor rely on unreliable environmental ‘bread crumbs’ because that’s never going to go into a production nanobot. Of course that will have to wait until are ability to engineer at the nanometer increases somewhat obviously, as even a simple wi-fi and small cpu would probably be too difficult to do right now.

]]>