<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boeing VP Dreams of Nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=478</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Living Fractal</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=478#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>The Living Fractal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=478#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Re:Who?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My previous comment was supposed to be attached to the other post, but you already know that.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Re:Who?</strong></p>
<p>My previous comment was supposed to be attached to the other post, but you already know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Living Fractal</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=478#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>The Living Fractal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=478#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Who?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These people aren&#039;t even worthy of mention. While their concern may be valid their method is atrocious. They gather together to demean the great, visionary, people who are working in the labs around the world with a noble idea that what they&#039;re doing is going to help people all over the world, when in fact what they&#039;re doing is so counter-productive they should be shot. Ok, not shot, but at least, for the sake of the rest of us, ignored. There&#039;s no point in an Anti-Tech movement, it&#039;s contradictory, it&#039;s anathema, it&#039;s plain stupid. It&#039;s like putting on a blindfold to see better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let the real minds do the work of debating an evolving ethical premise over the danger new Tech, these Fat Earth look-alikes aren&#039;t helping, they&#039;re just there to hear themselves whine, and I&#039;m sick of it.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who?</strong></p>
<p>These people aren&#39;t even worthy of mention. While their concern may be valid their method is atrocious. They gather together to demean the great, visionary, people who are working in the labs around the world with a noble idea that what they&#39;re doing is going to help people all over the world, when in fact what they&#39;re doing is so counter-productive they should be shot. Ok, not shot, but at least, for the sake of the rest of us, ignored. There&#39;s no point in an Anti-Tech movement, it&#39;s contradictory, it&#39;s anathema, it&#39;s plain stupid. It&#39;s like putting on a blindfold to see better.</p>
<p>Let the real minds do the work of debating an evolving ethical premise over the danger new Tech, these Fat Earth look-alikes aren&#39;t helping, they&#39;re just there to hear themselves whine, and I&#39;m sick of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>