<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solid state synthetic molecular machine points to advanced nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molecular Machine Breakthrough: Solid State Synthetic Molecular Machine &#124; Accelerating Future</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1177097</link>
		<dc:creator>Molecular Machine Breakthrough: Solid State Synthetic Molecular Machine &#124; Accelerating Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1177097</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Foresight Institute. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Foresight Institute. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University of Windsor (Canada) chemists and molecular machines &#171; FrogHeart</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1168330</link>
		<dc:creator>University of Windsor (Canada) chemists and molecular machines &#171; FrogHeart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1168330</guid>
		<description>[...] Institute blog, where they have a very strong interest in molecular machines, commented in a June 26, 2012 posting, A key component of exploratory engineering studies for molecular manufacturing or productive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Institute blog, where they have a very strong interest in molecular machines, commented in a June 26, 2012 posting, A key component of exploratory engineering studies for molecular manufacturing or productive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1168014</link>
		<dc:creator>flashgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1168014</guid>
		<description>I have had passing efforts to think about how to combine these solid state rotaxan molecular motors/gears with other enabling nanotechnology. 

the Dna nanotechnology can be used as a kind of mask from which molecules of various kinds can be deposited in desired positions; or, you can bind the rotaxane solid state on a part of a dna strand and self assemble it in various ways. That&#039;s dna nanotechnology.

Honestly, I really havn&#039;t concluded anything( i just say the foresight blog entry yesterday!); but, here&#039;s a similar concern or idea from some dna-nanotechnology I&#039;ve had.  The problem with dna-nanotechnology is it&#039;s in solution and well, you have a lot of atoms and moleculars bumping around whether you want them or not.  Solution?  Well, after getting the right molecular structure(like a robotic arm), how to control it without the dna-nanotech machine being in solution?  Well, have the dna-nano structure on the outside of a bag where the solution of dna messengers and water are kept.  So, there&#039;s a bag of some sufficiency where all the dna-nanotechnology goes on, and there&#039;s an outside nanostructure that is being controlled.  Well,  one can find problems and solutions to those problems from there. 

Obviously, the Feynman/Drexler nanotechnology people are excited about this because they can avoid the solution phase chemistry problems.  But, they still need to isolate it in a vacuum.  That&#039;s why I brought up my idea of isolating a dna-nanomachine on the outside where the solution phase chemistry is isolated.  I&#039;m really writing while I&#039;m thinking!  Like I said at the start, I just read this yesterday; and, I&#039;m not in a position to try anything(i quit school for rather interesting reasons; i&#039;ve tested things by hanging out on camposs to see how people are; i always end up with cops protecting me at the library; they&#039;re always kicking it with the librarians, can&#039;t believing they have to hang out in the library!  I guess I could say discretely, that I have gangster problems!  That&#039;s as far as I should really describe it!)

The fact that you&#039;d like to preciselly place a chunk of solid state rotaxane gears/motors suggests stm usage.
 One could use these UWDM-1 to fold up graphene(which as I already stated graphene can now be shaped two dimensionally to atomic specification) in desired shapes.
 One could attach or use the UWDM-1 as a cam to a protein that can do some certain chemistry function.

Bottom line, one can see the light at the end of the tunnel with UWDM-1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had passing efforts to think about how to combine these solid state rotaxan molecular motors/gears with other enabling nanotechnology. </p>
<p>the Dna nanotechnology can be used as a kind of mask from which molecules of various kinds can be deposited in desired positions; or, you can bind the rotaxane solid state on a part of a dna strand and self assemble it in various ways. That&#8217;s dna nanotechnology.</p>
<p>Honestly, I really havn&#8217;t concluded anything( i just say the foresight blog entry yesterday!); but, here&#8217;s a similar concern or idea from some dna-nanotechnology I&#8217;ve had.  The problem with dna-nanotechnology is it&#8217;s in solution and well, you have a lot of atoms and moleculars bumping around whether you want them or not.  Solution?  Well, after getting the right molecular structure(like a robotic arm), how to control it without the dna-nanotech machine being in solution?  Well, have the dna-nano structure on the outside of a bag where the solution of dna messengers and water are kept.  So, there&#8217;s a bag of some sufficiency where all the dna-nanotechnology goes on, and there&#8217;s an outside nanostructure that is being controlled.  Well,  one can find problems and solutions to those problems from there. </p>
<p>Obviously, the Feynman/Drexler nanotechnology people are excited about this because they can avoid the solution phase chemistry problems.  But, they still need to isolate it in a vacuum.  That&#8217;s why I brought up my idea of isolating a dna-nanomachine on the outside where the solution phase chemistry is isolated.  I&#8217;m really writing while I&#8217;m thinking!  Like I said at the start, I just read this yesterday; and, I&#8217;m not in a position to try anything(i quit school for rather interesting reasons; i&#8217;ve tested things by hanging out on camposs to see how people are; i always end up with cops protecting me at the library; they&#8217;re always kicking it with the librarians, can&#8217;t believing they have to hang out in the library!  I guess I could say discretely, that I have gangster problems!  That&#8217;s as far as I should really describe it!)</p>
<p>The fact that you&#8217;d like to preciselly place a chunk of solid state rotaxane gears/motors suggests stm usage.<br />
 One could use these UWDM-1 to fold up graphene(which as I already stated graphene can now be shaped two dimensionally to atomic specification) in desired shapes.<br />
 One could attach or use the UWDM-1 as a cam to a protein that can do some certain chemistry function.</p>
<p>Bottom line, one can see the light at the end of the tunnel with UWDM-1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NanoMan</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1167874</link>
		<dc:creator>NanoMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1167874</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right flash. Great post. I have a question for you. Starting with DNA nanotech, STM/AFM probes, and these early molecular motors, how do you think full scale assembler replicator systems could be developed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right flash. Great post. I have a question for you. Starting with DNA nanotech, STM/AFM probes, and these early molecular motors, how do you think full scale assembler replicator systems could be developed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1167509</link>
		<dc:creator>flashgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5225#comment-1167509</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if dna-nanotechnology can self-organize these into various patterns;

There&#039;s also been great work in using stm&#039;s to make arbitrary and precise graphene shapes.  One way or another, this is exciting for those who would like to see nanomanufacturing happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if dna-nanotechnology can self-organize these into various patterns;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also been great work in using stm&#8217;s to make arbitrary and precise graphene shapes.  One way or another, this is exciting for those who would like to see nanomanufacturing happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>