<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JPL jumps on the nanotechnology bandwagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=530</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=530#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=530#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A bandwagon? Hooray!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bandwagon has a bit of a negative connatation, and I suspect you said it to have a dig at JPL, but I welcome the term. Nanotech research is large enough to have a bandwagon? Excellent!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A bandwagon? Hooray!</strong></p>
<p>Bandwagon has a bit of a negative connatation, and I suspect you said it to have a dig at JPL, but I welcome the term. Nanotech research is large enough to have a bandwagon? Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>