<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing and improving scaffolded DNA origami for molecular nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5473</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5473#comment-1294301</link>
		<dc:creator>flashgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5473#comment-1294301</guid>
		<description>has the first nanomanufacturing sputnik gone up?

http://www.nanowerk.com/news2/newsid=28319.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has the first nanomanufacturing sputnik gone up?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nanowerk.com/news2/newsid=28319.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.nanowerk.com/news2/newsid=28319.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5473#comment-1287456</link>
		<dc:creator>flashgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5473#comment-1287456</guid>
		<description>I should also mention the Eric Winfree group; i&#039;m sure there&#039;s others I&#039;ve not heard of;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also mention the Eric Winfree group; i&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s others I&#8217;ve not heard of;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5473#comment-1287452</link>
		<dc:creator>flashgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5473#comment-1287452</guid>
		<description>The Paul Rothemund origami improved upon here provides more programmability than the dna nanobricks.

I wonder what Mr Phoenix thinks of all this latest dna-nanotech stuff; he hates squishy squashy; me?  The process might be squishy squashy, but once built, these can be taken out of their water domains and used mechanically.  

I can only assume you&#039;ve told the likes of Paul Rothemund, Ned Seeman and others about Mr Phoenix&#039;s planar(scaling affects) roadmap mentioned in the previous dna-nanobricks post?  Seems there&#039;s no dna-nanotech in this years foresight conference; has Drexler and Phoenix given up that much on dna-nanomanufacturing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Paul Rothemund origami improved upon here provides more programmability than the dna nanobricks.</p>
<p>I wonder what Mr Phoenix thinks of all this latest dna-nanotech stuff; he hates squishy squashy; me?  The process might be squishy squashy, but once built, these can be taken out of their water domains and used mechanically.  </p>
<p>I can only assume you&#8217;ve told the likes of Paul Rothemund, Ned Seeman and others about Mr Phoenix&#8217;s planar(scaling affects) roadmap mentioned in the previous dna-nanobricks post?  Seems there&#8217;s no dna-nanotech in this years foresight conference; has Drexler and Phoenix given up that much on dna-nanomanufacturing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>