<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-engineering a junction to give a new twist to DNA nanotechnology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5602</link>
	<description>examining transformative technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5602#comment-1400949</link>
		<dc:creator>flashgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5602#comment-1400949</guid>
		<description>http://phys.org/news/2013-04-evolutionary-oomph-synthetic-polymers-genetic.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://phys.org/news/2013-04-evolutionary-oomph-synthetic-polymers-genetic.html" rel="nofollow">http://phys.org/news/2013-04-evolutionary-oomph-synthetic-polymers-genetic.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5602#comment-1397638</link>
		<dc:creator>flashgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=5602#comment-1397638</guid>
		<description>http://www.nanowerk.com/news2/biotech/newsid=29780.php

These transcriptors are practically assemblers that do nano-chemistry!  I&#039;m not sure if Eric Winfree was the first to say this; but, i recall hearing him say that the Ned Seeman dna-nanotechnology actually works better in cells than out of them.  So, here, we have transcriptors/assemblers, and by doing the Ned Seeman dna-nanotechnologies inside the cell, the nanochemistry can be self-organised inside the cell by Seeman-dnananostructures.  

Cells are covered by pores that allow certain chemicals in and excrete certain products or even waste.  I think that dna-nanostructures punctured into cells has already been demonstrated.  So, we could extend the self organising of transcriptor products inside the cell and put a super-pore on the cell that allows the self-organised nanomechanical whatever outside to an extended Seeman/Rothemund dna-structure which can do more assembly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nanowerk.com/news2/biotech/newsid=29780.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.nanowerk.com/news2/biotech/newsid=29780.php</a></p>
<p>These transcriptors are practically assemblers that do nano-chemistry!  I&#8217;m not sure if Eric Winfree was the first to say this; but, i recall hearing him say that the Ned Seeman dna-nanotechnology actually works better in cells than out of them.  So, here, we have transcriptors/assemblers, and by doing the Ned Seeman dna-nanotechnologies inside the cell, the nanochemistry can be self-organised inside the cell by Seeman-dnananostructures.  </p>
<p>Cells are covered by pores that allow certain chemicals in and excrete certain products or even waste.  I think that dna-nanostructures punctured into cells has already been demonstrated.  So, we could extend the self organising of transcriptor products inside the cell and put a super-pore on the cell that allows the self-organised nanomechanical whatever outside to an extended Seeman/Rothemund dna-structure which can do more assembly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>