http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=758 examining transformative technology Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:23:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=758#comment-74680 wtash Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:16:49 +0000 http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=758#comment-74680 Thanks for maintaing the site. I wonder if the NIH and NSF impetus to tie together a variety of institutions for conduct of related projects doesn't always makes sense.{except reduce the NSF_NIH staffing neeeded for oniversity oversite) or spometimes get in the way for the "Roadmap". It also seems as if the material sciences have looked with desiremeet red and finally have their chance to move ahead into the top echelons of funding=yet here may be a cost for puting so much on nano while other fields go underfunded. Finally I would guess most regions will not be centers of nanotechnology research and manufacturing, and are holding on to dreams that waon't develop, Perhaps the regions have already been shaped except for a few smerging ones as Houiston, the Floida belt, Thanks for maintaing the site. I wonder if the NIH and NSF impetus to tie together a variety of institutions for conduct of related projects doesn’t always makes sense.{except reduce the NSF_NIH staffing neeeded for oniversity oversite) or spometimes get in the way for the “Roadmap”. It also seems as if the material sciences have looked with desiremeet red and finally have their chance to move ahead into the top echelons of funding=yet here may be a cost for puting so much on nano while other fields go underfunded. Finally I would guess most regions will not be centers of nanotechnology research and manufacturing, and are holding on to dreams that waon’t develop, Perhaps the regions have already been shaped except for a few smerging ones as Houiston, the Floida belt,

]]>