Foresight Nanotech Institute Logo
Image of nano

Nanotechnology legislation introduced into US House

from the nanotechnology-goes-to-Washington dept.
Gina Miller writes "House Gets Own Nanotech Legislation to Consider, a story carried on dc.internet.com on Oct. 18, reports legislation introduced into the US House of Representatives that would establish an independent advisory board comprised of leaders from industry and academia to provide oversight related to the government's National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI)." "The Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Advisory Board Act was introduced by Rep. Mike Honda, D-Calif., a member of the House Science Committee whose district includes Silicon Valley." The article quotes Honda on both the importance of nanotechnology and the importance of preparing for the novel issues that nanotechnology will raise:

"It will take many years of sustained federal investment for the nanotechnology industry to achieve maturity, and it is critical that the President has structures in place to ensure that the U.S. leads the world in its development," Honda said in a statement. "The federal government's nanotechnology strategy must have clear goals and metrics to assess our country's progress. Additionally, nanotechnology will give rise to a host of novel social, ethical, philosophical and legal issues. It will be important to have a group in place to predict and work to alleviate anticipated problems."

The Honda bill echoes a bill already passed by the Senate Commerce Committee, the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act, which awaits consideration by the full Senate. [See previous nanodot posts Senate Bill to fund ethical, social nanotech studies and Senate Committee passes nanotech bill].

A slightly more detailed report on the same topic was carried by Small Times: California Congressman Introduces New Nanotech Bill In U.S. House reports that a second nanotechnology bill may be introduced into the House by Science Committee chairman, Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, (R-NY), that would be comparable to the bill passed by the Senate Committee. The relationship of the two House bills was not yet clear. The story quotes support for the Honda bill by Norm Wu, managing director of Alameda Capital, and by Meyya Meyyappan, director of the Center for Nanotechnology at the NASA Ames Research Center.

Both articles make the point that the National Nanotechnology Initiative currently exists at the whim of the president, without its own dedicated staff or budget, and that the Honda Bill would give the NNI more influence and security than it currently has.

2 Responses to “Nanotechnology legislation introduced into US House”

  1. bugstuff Says:

    Happiness: Zapped with Extra Zolt of Ionic Pulsars

    As the United States Congress begins the process of hammering out and enacting major legislation pertaining to development and implementation of nanotechnology on a grand social plateau, it is more than appropriate to rehash old ideas about our inalienable right to happiness in a futuristic context of greater freedom new emerging technology may provide in upcoming years of the new millennium.

    Some information within this current Wonderful Life Foundation Feature article post to the Nanodot.org Public Forum may be redundant.

    Redundancy is justified by incorporating a new tangent of rehashing old ideas contained within the Declaration of Independence in the framework of our inalienable right to pursue happiness in an era of remarkable scientific progress.

    I have paid close attention to the Nationwide road tour showcasing one of the original Declaration of Independence documents. Click here to visit the web site of the organization promoting the Declaration of Independence road tour.

    The Declaration of Independence is not just an old torn tattered parchment collecting dust in a museum showcase window display. The Declaration of Independence is a living dynamic vital document containing ideas that live today within the human heart.

    I would like to make a proposal to management of the organization promoting the Declaration of Independence road tour that the Wonderful Life Foundation e-mail documentation pertaining to development and implementation of nanotechnology on a grand social plateau be incorporated with the Declaration of Independence Road Tour.

    I believe ideas presented by Wonderful Life Foundation are fuel for thought. The Founding Fathers of the United States of America never imagined in their wildest dreams the incredible power of the internet and telecommunications in the modern era.

    Perplexity associated with new emerging science and technology may challenge each and every unique individual to reexamine and rethink concepts of individual freedom and our inalienable right to pursue happiness.

    The next stop on the Declaration of Independence road tour is Centre College located in Danville, Kentucky.

    Click here to visit the web site of Centre College.

    ___________________________________________

    PENMENSHIP OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS
    FORGING NEW IDEAS ABOUT OUR INALIENABLE RIGHT
    TO PURSUE HAPPINESS IN CONTEXT OF SOCIALOGICAL ISSUES
    PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
    OF NANOTECHNOLOGY ON GRAND SOCIAL PLATEAU.

    Our inalienable right to happiness is closely scrutinized, considered highly suspect, surrounded by a cloud of suspicion, and often held in contempt.

    What right do we have to happiness when so many have shed blood and sacrificed their life on the battlefield defending liberty so we may have freedom? What right do we have to happiness when so many people die of starvation and hunger?

    Why should military soldiers volunteer to fight future battles when certain citizens choose to stay home to pursue happiness by wining and dining potential clients while engaged in a business start-up?

    Such troubling vexing questions can make beads of perspiration break out on the forehead of people who struggle to live an authentic life by exercising an inalienable right to pursue happiness as a choice.

    Is it possible the founding fathers made a philosophical error when the founding fathers framed the Declaration of Independence? The Declaration of Independence contains the following eloquent statement:

    ìWe hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.î United States of America Declaration of Independence

    Moral and ethical debates pertaining to new emerging future technology may serve to intensify the dark cloud of suspicion surrounding our inalienable right to pursue happiness.

    The history of science allows scientist to make predictions about future scientific progress. Predictions about future scientific progress are extrapolative data derived from historical development of science.

    Scientific extrapolations predict discovery of molecular computational machines known as nanobots. Nanobots may allow an enhancement of extrasensory perception.

    The future enhancement of extrasensory perception may allow people to transmit memories like radio waves. The ability to transmit memories like radio waves may lead to a social transformation known as the Singularity.

    New futuristic scientific concepts such as the singularity may present especially troubling challenging issues pertaining to individual freedom and our inalienable right to pursue happiness.

    Life is about making choices. In a brown bag lunch study of ancient Scripture a question was posed, ìWhat is sin?î

    Sin is any action that prevents a person from becoming all that God created that person to be. God created every person to be a vessel for love and service, foremost to God, and secondly to oneís neighbor.

    The denial of Life, Liberty, and happiness to a person is sin. Exercise of excessive power and control is a pervasive characteristic in dysfunctional interpersonal relationships.

    The exercise of excessive power and control contributes to domestic violence and high crime rates. The exercise of excessive power and control over the lives of other people amount to attempts to snuff out the God given gift of human personality.

    The future may be filled with an abundance of new choices. New types of pro-choice movements may arise. Should an individual be allowed to decide how he or she shall walk hand and hand with his or her Maker and pursue Life, Liberty, and happiness despite uncertainty and a variable number of unknowns?

    Click here to read the Wonderful Life Foundation Feature article entitled INCREASING UNCERTAINTY AMONG EXPERTS CONTRIBUTING TO FUDGING NUMBERS IN CORPORATE SCANDALS.

    In past years, I have been a science buff who has vigorously pursued a very strong interest in the fairly new science of nanotechnology. My effort to keep pace with the cutting edge of science and technology has been akin to FBI agent Fox Mulderís effort to chase down UFOís in the popular television show, the X-Files.

    I get up in the morning thinking about nanotechnology. I go to bed at night thinking about nanotechnology.

    I am trying to start a new foundation entitled, Wonderful Life Foundation. The focus of the new Not for Profit Organization I am trying to start is scientific advancement as related to achieving the American Dream of homeownership.

    The focus of my idea for a new foundation is to help responsible citizens in the United States to get out of debt and stay out of debt by providing 30-year fixed rate mortgages with an extremely low interest rate of 3%.

    Low interest fixed rate 30-year mortgages will be provided to families regardless of income. It will not be necessary to be poor to qualify.

    When families in the United States become solvent, at that point, they will be prepared to help the poorest of the poor, be of greater service, and be more able to participate in other philanthropy and charitable efforts.

    Wonderful Life Foundation will help families that potentially may become dislocated displaced workers sustain rapid scientific progress by helping families become solvent by achieving home ownership as rapidly as possible.

    Socioeconomic change involves powerful emotional reactions. Socioeconomic change has the potential to brush people the wrong way. However, I believe a future generation may someday be thankful a new foundation like Wonderful Life Foundation miraculously came into existence.

    Most people today are struggling to earn a living. Most people today do not have time to think in-depth about issues pertaining to the future. Traditional Business organizations are heavily invested in the technology of today, thus are not motivated to contribute to public policy that may help build a better future.

    I have given considerable thought to the concept of ìlife, liberty, and the pursuit of happinessî in the framework of new freedoms science and technology may one day provide. The uneasiness I feel concerning the assertion happiness is a choice may be due to adversity and hardship we should choose to endure.

    If brave soldiers who valiantly defended freedom and democracy on the battlefield deliberately made a conscious decision to pursue happiness as a choice than citizens of the United States of America may be living under an oppressive brutal dictatorship today.

    The Wonderful Life Foundation feature article entitled Cosmic Joke is a chronicle of a lost drifting soul searching for happiness in an era of rapid socioeconomic change as a consequence of accelerating rate of scientific progress.

    Click here to read Cosmic Joke. Cosmic Joke is a discourse pertaining to concepts of (1)addiction and (2)happiness as a choice in the context of new freedoms future generations may experience due to development and implementation of nanotechnology (http://www.foresight.org) on a grand social plateau.

    An individual does not have to wait to enter a complex maze of future technology to be considered lost and drifting. The human soul can be lost by drowning in the swift under current of the present day digital divide.

    Wonderful Life Foundation has posted a feature article on the Nanodot.org Public Forum providing profound insight into a dynamic pursuit of happiness as an inalienable right.

    The Wonderful Life Foundation feature article entitled, Jerry Senfield Comedy as Related to Reverse Polarity, provides a physiological model explaining the psychological mechanism of humor.

    Click here to read the Wonderful Life Foundation article entitled,AN AFFIRMATION OF FAMED AUTHOR JOHN GRAY'S ASSERTION MEN ARE FROM MARS CONTAINED IN THE NEW WONDERFUL LIFE FOUNDATION FEATURE ARTICLE ENTITLED, JERRY SEINFELD COMEDY AS RELATED TO REVERSE POLARITY.

    Jay Leno, host of The NBC Tonight Show, and famed actor and director Arnold Schwarzenegger zapped my brain with an extra zolt of reverse polarity neuron-electrical chemical pulsars. If I donít quit watching NBC The Tonight Show I may end up with a short circuit.

    Click here to visit the official Arnold Schwarzenegger web site.

    On the October 29th episode of The Tonight Show, Jay Leno questioned Arnold Schwarzenegger about rumor a female terminator may be included in the new terminator movie, Terminator III: Rise of the Machines.

    Jay asked Arnold, ìWill there be terminator sex?î Arnold replied, ìterminator sex may include electrical jump cables and a crow barî.

    The U.S. Congress should be mindful of social responsibility to preserve the act of sex, as consummation of the rite of Holy Matrimony, by not allowing sex to deteriorate to a state where electrical jump cables and a crow bar are needed.

    Jay asked Arnold if he plans to run for governor. Arnold quipped, ìI have to leave that up to the almighty, my wife Marie.î

    Arnold, run this past Marie, ìArnold Schwarzenegger for President of the United States of Americaî.

  2. Kadamose Says:

    Pay no mind to them

    I don't get it – how can the scientific community listen to these worthless bureaucrats? They make all the rules, and yet, at the same time, don't understand the technology they are making the rules for. They are all technically challenged and should have been left behind in the last century….why are they still here, and why is everyone still listening to them?

    The people who should be in power, are the people who understand the technology and the responsibility that comes along with it. None of the fools who are currently in there have any of these traits, and therefore, should be promptly ignored and disposed of.

Leave a Reply