«  
  »

Nanolegos and Programmable Assemblers?

By RobertBradbury, on December 20th, 2004

A group lead by Luc Jaeger at UCSB is reporting [1] in the Dec. 17 2004 issue of Science that they now can program RNA building blocks to self-assemble into complex shapes. Interestingly if extended slightly and combined with certain chemical mixthres that polymerize or perhaps light-hardened polymers one could use the RNA pieces to create casting molds that would allow you to "cast" nanoscale parts with relatively precise atomic dimensions and a relatively high density of covalent bonds. More…

1. Chworos A, Severcan I, Koyfman AY, Weinkam P, Oroudjev E, Hansma HG, Jaeger L., "Building programmable jigsaw puzzles with RNA," Science 306(5704):2068-72 (17 Dec 2004).
Interestingly, Nadrian Seeman has a report in the same issue of Science for a "nanomechanical DNA device" which from the abstract appears to be a DNA state machine [Is this a prelude to a DNA based Turing machine assembler???]. As currently designed it is driven by DNA and produces DNA but it does not appear to use the normal base pair "matching" which is required by DNA polymerase (which is also effectively a DNA assembler). However because it is a DNA based assembler that produces DNA that would suggest that the potential for exponential growth in the quantity of devices available is very high. (Mind you the potential may not be there yet — one has to deal with things like transport time for the instructions and error correction of the product — but the potential seems to be there).

2. Liao S, Seeman NC., "Translation of DNA signals into polymer assembly instructions," Science 306(5704):2072-4 (17 Dec 2004).

December 20th, 2004 | Category: News

3 comments to Nanolegos and Programmable Assemblers?

  • ChrisPhoenix
    December 21st, 2004 at 8:53 AM

    Didn't Seeman show this at Foresight?

    At the recent Foresight conference, Seeman showed a DNA machine that would twist back and forth depending on whether a strand was bound to it. And the other side of the machine would catalyze strands to link together. (I forget whether there was another enzyme involved in the linkage, or whether it was just driven by the huge effective concentrations you get with positional control.) Depending on whether the machine was twisted back or forth, two different sequences could be made.

    So this machine still delivers less than one bit-per-building-block, but not by much! And although at first sight it seems like a toy proof-of-concept, I can think of at least two ways to make it more interesting. One: present tRNA binding sites, and use it to make proteins. Two: instead of just two selectable sequence binders, make a rotor with lots of them.

    Chris

  • RobertBradbury
    December 20th, 2004 at 3:02 PM

    More info on RNA tectonics

    More information on the RNA tectonics & JigSaw Puzzle self-assembly can be found at physorg.com here.

  • RobertBradbury
    December 20th, 2004 at 2:58 PM

    Revenge is a dish best served cold…

    It looks like the day is fast approaching when we could manufacture ~2 kg of the Liao/Seeman assemblers (or derivatives thereof) and send 1 kg to both Smalley & Whitesides as Christmas presents….