Foresight Nanotech Institute Logo
Image of nano

Reynolds promotes nanotechnology for Earth Day

Foresight advisor Glenn Reynolds opines about nanotech in the NY Post for Earth Day:

MIT’s Vladimir Bulovic calls nanotech a potentially “disruptive technology” in the solar-energy field, offering a complete shift from today’s fossil-fuel environment…

Nanotech offers dramatic improvements on the side of energy consumption, too: As computing and other devices become smaller, they become more efficient – and nanotech will allow drastic improvements in both size and efficiency.

Nanotech is starting to yield super-strong, super-light materials, too. Imagine how much more efficient a family car could be if you cut the weight in half, even if you kept burning gas. But nanotech is also likely to produce better batteries and better motors, meaning that your lighter car may also be electric, powered ultimately by those nanodot solar panels.

All of these things are in the works now to greater and lesser degrees, but they could happen faster if there were more research and development support.

Ultimately, we’re probably better off putting our energies into promoting cleaner, more advanced technologies like these than in trying to get people to reduce the scope of their lives through “hair-shirt environmentalism.”

Hair-shirts have always had their fans, but have seldom been widely adopted. On the other hand, most people would like to lead cleaner, better, more efficient lives. Why not give ‘em what they want, and help the planet at the same time?

A focus on cutting energy consumption with today’s technology isn’t going to make much of a difference. Let’s work on replacing current tech with something better, instead.

Let’s try for the win-win scenarios. —Christine

4 Responses to “Reynolds promotes nanotechnology for Earth Day”

  1. Mike Treder Says:

    Why is my previously submitted comment still “awaiting moderation” after more than 18 hours?

  2. Christine Peterson Says:

    Hi Mike — I can’t find your previously submitted comment. Can you resubmit?
    Sorry,
    Christine

  3. Mike Treder Says:

    Yes, I will (although I’m wondering why it’s been over a week now). My original question was: Does Foresight support Glenn’s position that “cutting energy consumption with today’s technology” is not worthwhile?

  4. Christine Peterson Says:

    Hi Mike — Here’s what Glenn said:

    “Ultimately, we’re probably better off putting our energies into promoting cleaner, more advanced technologies like these…A focus on cutting energy consumption with today’s technology isn’t going to make much of a difference. Let’s work on replacing current tech with something better, instead.”

    I think his point here is that there are plenty of other people working on cutting consumption, and that doing only that will not fix the problem. Those of us able to develop new technologies should focus on that instead, because that is where the big payoffs will be. Probably Glenn, you, and I would agree on that. —Christine

Leave a Reply