|
||||||
Potential of nanotechnology for clean energy draws attention of US presidential candidatesA role for nanotech applications can be seen in the responses to the US energy crisis made by both candidates for the US Presidency. In remarks prepared for delivery in Lansing, Michigan Senator Barack Obama called for new energy for America. Among the many steps he advocated:
A recent MSU news release highlighted the energy applications of a new nanomaterial developed in the laboratory of MSU researcher Lawrence Drzal—xGnP Exfoliated Graphite NanoPlatelets.
As a step toward solving American energy problems, Senator John McCain has suggested a national prize of $300 million for anyone who can develop a better, more efficient car battery. Although Senator McCain did not mention nanotechnology in his proposal, nanotech solutions for better batteries were mentioned in several comments posted in response to the article. 1 comment to Potential of nanotechnology for clean energy draws attention of US presidential candidates |
||||||
|
Copyright © 2009 the Foresight Institute - All Rights Reserved |
||||||
I’m all in favor of nanotech, but I don’t think it’s helpful to constantly promote it in a way that suggests it’s a quick fix for our current energy crisis.
We have allowed ourselves to become dependent on hostile or unstable nations who are hardly as concerned about the environment as we are. We would do better by developing our own natural resources and investing the economic returns in promising new technologies, without announcing the Next Nano Thing until it’s ready to market.
If I have misinterpreted the state of these developments, I apologize, but I can’t imagine anything here enabling us to wean ourselves from oil overnight.